From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Aug 21 09:36:16 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MeX68-0006Er-IQ for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:36:16 -0700 Received: from sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.67]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MeX63-0006D2-NW for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:36:16 -0700 Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (unknown [IPv6:2001:700:300:2000:2a0:c9ff:feab:76e2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sabre-wulf.nvg.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B997A94789 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:35:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n7LGZK2J023787 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:35:20 +0200 Received: (from arj@localhost) by hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no (8.13.8/8.13.1/Submit) id n7LGZKXr023786 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:35:20 +0200 Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:35:20 +0200 From: Arnt Richard Johansen To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Checkpointed cmavo Message-ID: <20090821163520.GB5073@nvg.org> References: <362368.3736.qm@web88007.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <362368.3736.qm@web88007.mail.re2.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-NVG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-NVG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: arj@nvg.ntnu.no Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 15987 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: arj@nvg.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:07:24AM -0700, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > I was looking for a clear list of checkpointed cmavo, but was only > able to find this: > http://lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=BPFK+Checkpoints&bl=y > > How can I tell from this list which proposed definitions have been > voted on and checkpointed and which have not?  I seem to remember > there was another wiki page that made it clear, but it seems to have > disappeared. This one? http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=BPFK+Sections -- Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ As soon as we started programming, we found to our surprise that it wasn't as easy to get programs right as we had thought. Debugging had to be discovered. I can remember the exact instant when I realized that a large part of my life from then on was going to be spent in finding mistakes in my own programs. -- Maurice Wilkes discovers debugging, 1949 To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.