From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Sep 02 11:24:08 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:24:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MiuV5-0005Ac-UV for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:24:08 -0700 Received: from mail-vw0-f193.google.com ([209.85.212.193]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MiuV0-00059c-QI for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:24:07 -0700 Received: by vws31 with SMTP id 31so994721vws.28 for ; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:23:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=2QTziG/uaOjYGm84j11+q4oP3qztTqPAg3jWwj2rw4s=; b=ZZs7YBc3y0uFSZ9lxSmnrDUhVgFN3JfIM0B2sxyLrbOV2aByHioHOqHsHEf9uzN/e0 0lM+qw1Rsuylfz07J5MGF/4r5GAXwYQgnQLYUZLW9GlltbaVSYMGnrLRyZ9qBorhAlqT DP4GnAvV6J0vMn+BgznUZ8ESfONOG5FZg+Joo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=XNMBZCDEGLsBEgrqm9VMziMlQ2XrOAuEffgHqgscWmc3QfFeS30g+qDXvIoB2rsYsm rH04x3RnrFa3R0TyBHziRxn6Dv5iSF1tU/zCTLly4YpMRjz5P3KZZuVsjjziR2uefekF 1aDxSw8WrP6q26h0S5ummubPXvz+c6lPwLbGQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.69.69 with SMTP id y5mr11362780vci.118.1251915836323; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 14:23:56 -0400 Message-ID: <5715b9300909021123o1a5414d2j10e65d88a0c5f9af@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] dictionary From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363105c9b6798604729c5e0f X-archive-position: 16071 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --0016363105c9b6798604729c5e0f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 So, I've seen a few versions of the dictionary come out now and am wondering... based on what you (some of the older lojbanists) have seen, if you had to make a rough estimate of when a "Final" version of a dictionary was ready to go to print, how long would that be? I ask because I love having hard copies of things like that and am very much looking forward to having a Lojban-English (and vice versa) dictionary on my bookshelf next to the CLL. Any ideas? Or is it still way too far out in the future to even guess? --0016363105c9b6798604729c5e0f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So, I've seen a few versions of the dictionary come out now and am wond= ering... based on what you (some of the older lojbanists) have seen, if you= had to make a rough estimate of when a "Final" version of a dict= ionary was ready to go to print, how long would that be?

I ask because I love having hard copies of things like that and am very= much looking forward to having a Lojban-English (and vice versa) dictionar= y on my bookshelf next to the CLL.

Any ideas?=A0 Or is it still way = too far out in the future to even guess?
--0016363105c9b6798604729c5e0f-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.