From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Sep 11 08:00:26 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mm7bt-0004j3-FN for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:00:25 -0700 Received: from mail-fx0-f211.google.com ([209.85.220.211]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mm7bp-0004gK-Ja for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:00:25 -0700 Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so809199fxm.34 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:00:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=2kV/bnPbTdBjmUE6VMfCoFHHlzbE+Sd9F5BdRFqdBxM=; b=rhtt5zRzhn34GqINY7SYC+Gs/dhQeMY3EqQiMNoeczjZjksRaL+g984F11+UhK66qb AskvaHjGxjL7xcBxrpFJp7aur6D3PE1oYOPwTqwiKBkZomncM2z5bNvQctBsoNCBYLDM tFWdDo4x9tUOGLheGmO/Z/aKw4robGv6b5Kw0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=dDF8K4R5T9d/FBCn3i5UZ9fwrAS5UUiWnQ5IELmfbVm0yb4/8zaAQNoMmYC70wlAwZ wjBqotCrhCwWVz+o7JQcFQhUGPvVybv1g6NQNHvtQTKcC641hl0OmoSpqoQG9uU+y9Po 5u5Csc5alFk64eIWaWfKTaQW60gA2PvySF4VY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.86.9 with SMTP id o9mr1502207mul.4.1252681214809; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 08:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:00:14 +0200 Message-ID: <23298cb40909110800j528aa090y2af41a204bbd7e13@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Logical connectives From: Remo Dentato To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 16151 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rdentato@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Hi there, I've a couple of questions on logical connectives (well, I actually would have more but I'll save the others for another time :) ). Is it correct to say that when using logical connectives like in: {mi cutka ti .a ta} , {ti .a ta} is a single sumti? Also, if I had abstractions {le nu ... kei .e le nu ... kei .e le nu ... kei} are the {kei} elidable? remod. To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.