From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Sep 22 02:30:32 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:30:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mq1hg-0006P7-Iu for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:30:32 -0700 Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com ([209.85.219.216]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mq1hd-0006Mf-CN for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:30:32 -0700 Received: by ewy12 with SMTP id 12so3797024ewy.0 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:30:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=k2bE2kUibLSWB2DuCpMuO8Jpf0YuCpk2+AMIbiBe7Q8=; b=Ndoo34DOtBvwq2HVbKplEiU/cFyLQdP/SE49Ylru88wDGTVl68g54D8InUXNfWhJbs Zap72UzJlgtMUO7a8HhVY1J96zmMQZa1I0NUmGMV0B1Z2bRAGdVwR6j6JIFixmImyylA MNrlHJGpaKe3Q6ZOFGqNGF17EOhIPuxJn+3UI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=YjArY9/uGHPf5H4FCh1gW7m1fo1AIQTbbr6ZAgqdaSo6AX+PEBB9OBBNHtgBHq3RPP r85idP2FXrULO1IoXqJ1DMD576VBlRmrwo305xIdIpO4JmvmRxah1Rt6CNODOBkBrTfD 6f0UR4I4Mg5nAC7OzxsfjJ9T03jwHziDNIeq8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.49.66 with SMTP id w44mr177222web.184.1253611822731; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:30:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5a3750120909200842v5e125db0m3f583f74605bcf93@mail.gmail.com> References: <8a20e9f70909191615we96905ftf531c456a43cffd9@mail.gmail.com> <5a3750120909200842v5e125db0m3f583f74605bcf93@mail.gmail.com> From: Daniel Brockman Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] Re: Generic specific sumti To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 16231 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: dbrockman@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Oleksii Melnyk wrote: > In the likelly case of our ability to express "le bu'a" in lojban > phrase involving "lo bu'e" or vice versa, "le co'e" will be  the same > as "lo co'e" by definition of "co'e". So what you're suggesting is that {lo co'e} and {le co'e} are identical? You don't consider {le co'e} to be a specific thing the speaker has in mind? -- Daniel Brockman daniel@brockman.se To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.