From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Oct 12 13:41:01 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MxRhU-00064k-Va for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:41:01 -0700 Received: from mail-yx0-f177.google.com ([209.85.210.177]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MxRhP-00063f-QQ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:41:00 -0700 Received: by yxe7 with SMTP id 7so1348541yxe.25 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:40:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OJqbD/HADT4nxpneQjuxwaqd7B/SZCdnq5xboEQWGL4=; b=JgOw+4UTJPRru8T+ZY6T0MsZ610HiIzBYIFkO85ZJTPZ0PWIjnJz7XDVVZdxpe3Abq aqwQk86k5qokAeuZyQQXqpBKNGrMsIUbdo/lIRrrkh5dXqEyWMBmdYG3w6On2l68nnEe agOjk8KwoM0SFQ3FZ3H8l2mq52LIUmkItj02g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=qHVAaeBWmZ4J/YapbWt6oZMPyua3rwWDwCbK7q70sTs5qHM0mQY8I+7KI6TAuXS8WB NfOEU6WiLK9W15ZQdg8SABAUaiuqm7oHGnGctKzv5Ijd7/Thv/Do58RcDr8EG2Hoxzh7 XJ0CTSX/5yhp9IeZpaEYm6/AzlbraSrXkhlxY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.86.12 with SMTP id o12mr10996499ybl.94.1255380049484; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:40:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5715b9300910121309g2e886e7dg881649ca6df2ee11@mail.gmail.com> References: <5715b9300910121309g2e886e7dg881649ca6df2ee11@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:40:49 -0400 Message-ID: <5715b9300910121340m50da9b7fh7697871dc71d66f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: questions about Ruth From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd241c6e85d520475c2f123 X-archive-position: 16326 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --000e0cd241c6e85d520475c2f123 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Also, 2:2 has the same issue as 2) below. So, I'm finding Ruth to be a really good read and excellent practice for my lojban skills. How can I contribute to this project? On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: > Someone mentioned Ruth on the jbovlaste list so I started reading through > it. So far I'm only up to 1:17 but I've found the following things that > need correcting I think: > > 1) In verses 1 and 2 there are 3 occurrences of "xabji" where I think the > author wanted "xabju". > 2) In verse 8 where the author said {.i la na,oMIN cusku fi le be'aspe lu > ...} I think they wanted {.i la na,oMIN cusku fi le be'aspe fe lu ...} > 3) In verse 17 we have {.i .aicai noda poi na'e nunmorsi zo'u da tersepli > mi do} I think it's going for "nothing which is not the event of death will > separate mi from you". But really isn't it saying "nothing (other than > death) that thing is separated from me [plus some un-defined x4 place for > {do}]. In other words, doesn't {noda poi ... zo'u} take x1 which puts the > next {da} in at x2 (causing {mi} to go to x3 and {do} to go to x4)? > > If I find more stuff as I read through I'll just put it in this thread. > --000e0cd241c6e85d520475c2f123 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also, 2:2 has the same issue as 2) below.

So, I'm finding Ruth t= o be a really good read and excellent practice for my lojban skills.=A0 How= can I contribute to this project?

On Mon= , Oct 12, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
Someone mentioned= Ruth on the jbovlaste list so I started reading through it.=A0 So far I= 9;m only up to 1:17 but I've found the following things that need corre= cting I think:

1)=A0 In verses 1 and 2 there are 3 occurrences of "xabji" wh= ere I think the author wanted "xabju".
2)=A0 In verse 8 where the author said {.i la na,oMIN cusku fi le be'as= pe lu ...} I think they wanted {.i la na,oMIN cusku fi le be'aspe fe lu= ...}
3)=A0 In verse 17 we have {.i .aicai noda poi na'e nunmorsi zo'u da tersepli mi do} I think it's goi= ng for "nothing which is not the event of death will separate mi from = you".=A0 But really isn't it saying "nothing (other than deat= h) that thing is separated from me [plus some un-defined x4 place for {do}]= .=A0 In other words, doesn't {noda poi ... zo'u} take x1 which puts= the next {da} in at x2 (causing {mi} to go to x3 and {do} to go to x4)?
If I find more stuff as I read through I'll just put it in this thr= ead.

--000e0cd241c6e85d520475c2f123-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.