From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Oct 17 08:51:20 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MzBYu-0005Zy-7a for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:51:20 -0700 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MzBYq-0005ZC-Cj for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:51:20 -0700 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so669724fge.10 for ; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:51:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sfyTaXlD3qemfUW+eWnwJn2VTOmtcptG35TMRNQfhQU=; b=OHCGyIZJFq/O0xcDRBdAbNlKDLtAoN8B7X65NQusGVXwAbX8qQstVFkSsuU7lEJzTP O1DIiFVwr+4iSdDLPf54Fv8EjU22CHIie1FoYln6a0ZFIk88gsMRxraMgvMwyqFL38QP KEnV6IOy4EyyaB8Km1Ta6xQ4A++/6Z+dy/ZRk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=IgB5g507q+oo9XVZC7u2pfs1sY4uGrdrrWVQ3yz9Uww0i/IYbblvfnx8snXFPszBrt VsvCYjYUG9RyYp6316xTAFRR4zmd6WlilbuFYbun+FIOVWNRGEK3VcD5s6YRcwiUteG2 xDjqoGDgwQmUm9muU2/4q+Ih2R+tW099OsFGw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.227.13 with SMTP id z13mr1925496fgg.72.1255794674905; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:51:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 17:51:14 +0200 Message-ID: <23298cb40910170851v40798f71h27164a8852f73388@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Alternate writing systems? From: Remo Dentato To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 16346 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rdentato@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 5:42 PM, wrote: > In a message dated 10/17/2009 07:37:39 Eastern Daylight Time, > carbon.evolve@gmail.com writes: >> >> The Elian script does look good, I wonder if there is any talk about >> standardizing a lojban orthography. >> > > I don't like the Elian script, and lojban orthography is already > standardized. I do like the Elian script but the lojban orthgraphy is already standardized and there are so few people learning the language that asking them to use a non-familiar seems not a good move to me. That said, the best way to promote Elian script would be to typeset a piece of lojban and send around for comments. I guess nothing will change, but I love calligraphy! :) remod To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.