From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Nov 06 06:04:23 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:04:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N6PQL-0005O4-Kr for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:04:22 -0800 Received: from mail-yw0-f204.google.com ([209.85.211.204]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N6PQC-0005Mr-NU for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:04:17 -0800 Received: by ywh42 with SMTP id 42so986550ywh.28 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:04:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lxoRG2ESgighZKjCNDKFd/b2W6n/Fqgw37JdRjV9wOk=; b=ktFf1yO/6Q/aMF7mg7tWKb/Xp5/+Zkb3cmBzkuy+BcQfVcpZrPdZXCf0iQmCyDD2Ri GAKY5uMXU95Do5uNxtUbQk2uPDMTfhpiDcVJOFLWlA3eS9Zed/9wQXxF+UcIh+e4WVa/ VWFbe0HZt7M1Dge8F82Kd/B9GnVVjrqDdwnAM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=e6K4uLaeVzEgYe3Kdon1WnJzWFeCuq9E9vgZpUE0eO9Bv0Rme+2L3NOu3HFcJ+nR6w lqJqcBdCGdeXTLRJmsoqAu/iGobgFXs/jTFs4ABIBlrTcah3llxO8Q2kLihtVBIpTMLJ x1pvovQW7+2JFyuy+ce5n1WogLsz1cfCzezLA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.21.25 with SMTP id y25mr8244900agi.66.1257516240595; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:04:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:04:00 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17560911060604r7d90fa80oa357d62396c67234@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Abstractors {ni} and {jei} (and {ka}) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 16450 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Daniel Brockman wrote: [...] > Well, I guess that's enough to get started. Great summary of the issue! If you really want some official answers I suggest: (1) you join the BPFK (obviously you are qualified) (2) you write the definitions for "ni" and "jei" (and perhaps for the rest of the NUs too, if you want). That section is currently assigned to Robin, but he might be happy to give it to you if you ask nicely. I have described the BPFK in the past as being dormant, but I don't think that's a fair description anymore. I think comatose is more appropriate at this point. We are in desperate need of new blood. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.