From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Nov 06 06:11:47 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:11:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N6PXW-0005uo-8S for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:11:46 -0800 Received: from mail-yx0-f202.google.com ([209.85.210.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N6PXR-0005tb-Fl for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:11:46 -0800 Received: by yxe40 with SMTP id 40so990830yxe.28 for ; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:11:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VW02RlQ9IgvSHL+0XI6ToAdT1yCLxtsj677rqIkZJgc=; b=IWvqwmaKmEcUhLkVZDoueeEzVAJMYgjVICIYmdK0aIawVlyFE+nB0X7mifb2/RqZp6 B9QQ1ZuBMk7Tf1nZZGQOgSLxm3UawhHFcGxRKLdQESHqh3jkY6nyqfVX62v4XF0HH096 0CVmIlNytk2/rgj8Shw1VTOyLAE7a885526vM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=NAhD58R9gchG/Ic8byD77Hv8eixi0aSRbZgkvm2Ip2jGiuBF8kk1OxP4C/04l8BlwQ 1+3ylxisvXcAghq5EkyLtoKA8fQhxgpHiAPkqxWtw4DCdzn9+aEB/rcflsnCh1GUkcjV kB8j9j2ye2tMmUOW53w7Yp04JwhV7yS38Wa3o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.141.15 with SMTP id o15mr7910820ybd.86.1257516694724; Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:11:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <925d17560911060604r7d90fa80oa357d62396c67234@mail.gmail.com> References: <925d17560911060604r7d90fa80oa357d62396c67234@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:11:34 -0500 Message-ID: <5715b9300911060611m459428bcvf3173a00e31b57c6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Abstractors {ni} and {jei} (and {ka}) From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd76054e35fd10477b46b10 X-archive-position: 16453 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --000e0cd76054e35fd10477b46b10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable that'd be awesome. I've heard that the main reason we're not trying to promote lojban yet is that it's not "complete". But for completion the bpf= k needs to finish definitions. But for bpfk to finish definitions they need to not be "comatose". But there are a set number of spots on it and no-one wants to relinquish their seat. How would dbrock get on (which I'm all for= , he's hella jbo-knowledgeable whenever I've talked to him) without someone leaving. 2009/11/6 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Daniel Brockman > wrote: > [...] > > Well, I guess that's enough to get started. > > Great summary of the issue! > > If you really want some official answers I suggest: > > (1) you join the BPFK (obviously you are qualified) > (2) you write the definitions for "ni" and "jei" (and perhaps for the > rest of the NUs too, if you want). > > That section is currently assigned to Robin, but he might be happy to > give it to you if you ask nicely. > > I have described the BPFK in the past as being dormant, but I don't > think that's a fair description anymore. I think comatose is more > appropriate at this point. We are in desperate need of new blood. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.or= g > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > --000e0cd76054e35fd10477b46b10 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable that'd be awesome.=A0 I've heard that the main reason we're not= trying to promote lojban yet is that it's not "complete".=A0= But for completion the bpfk needs to finish definitions.=A0 But for bpfk t= o finish definitions they need to not be "comatose".=A0 But there= are a set number of spots on it and no-one wants to relinquish their seat.= =A0 How would dbrock get on (which I'm all for, he's hella jbo-know= ledgeable whenever I've talked to him) without someone leaving.

2009/11/6 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Daniel Brockman <daniel@brockman.se> wrote:
[...]
> Well, I guess that's enough to get started.

Great summary of the issue!

If you really want some official answers I suggest:

(1) you join the BPFK (obviously you are qualified)
(2) you write the definitions for "ni" and "jei" (and p= erhaps for the
rest of the NUs too, if you want).

That section is currently assigned to Robin, but he might be happy to
give it to you if you ask nicely.

I have described the BPFK in the past as being dormant, but I don't
think that's a fair description anymore. I think comatose is more
appropriate at this point. We are in desperate need of new blood.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.


--000e0cd76054e35fd10477b46b10-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.