From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Nov 25 22:09:18 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:09:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NDXXZ-0000FR-W5 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:09:18 -0800 Received: from mail-yw0-f187.google.com ([209.85.211.187]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NDXXV-0000FB-Db for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:09:17 -0800 Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so446783ywh.2 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:09:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=uia8VWUfdNH7qFyw3Jz2PVUE0U7jndr7lniz9x6Uqes=; b=uzPhXyBnA80ykUXDGOXkw4Iwm1huBOvkYpNqe27Ss6cjKh2EgEL5w6Sd+36NKBuAW3 +NlyLlDxaWtFsD7MOKoWVxjv9sWpKPjqiYESQb/Q28AaRTQXQLZLzBsUOXWbl4x9fP2T ssn4xo+XlL932Yp4Clotyx2vDaz9C5lNw9XgU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Mjfv5FyHdwhmR/Az8z+kkeqNV4eItE5sXazQ4r8A+D8rpYWdQAi6LjkToRWDLpso8f wktUR+FfpVnLzMzyskiqB/XtpcZ8OT+BGkSxCutb8iI+ovfz8LBBd5eSQ0r676Zadngj 1oC0hNIas4y+SmzbxsVaKQWHlFw269Li5DX7g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.246.10 with SMTP id t10mr15143722ybh.226.1259215746453; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:09:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:09:06 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: [lojban] I'm writing a parser From: purpleposeidon To: lojban-list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-archive-position: 16488 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: purpleposeidon@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list http://github.com/purpleposeidon/zirsam/ It needs a ton of work still. For example, dendrography, the grammar-parsing-bit, doesn't like {oi broda}, and I haven't tested thaumatology, the magic-word portion, sufficiently. Nor have I tested the non-standard alphabets. And much more. However, I'd like to draw attention of its existence outside of IRC. My greatest concern right now is parsing valid lojban, not not parsing invalid lojban. My motivation for writing this is that I'd like to make a semantics engine. I believe Nick Nicholas (?) wrote something like that using camxes, tho I haven't used it. mu'o mi'e djeims To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.