From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Dec 03 13:52:07 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:52:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NGJap-0005Ue-IE for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:52:07 -0800 Received: from mail-gx0-f224.google.com ([209.85.217.224]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NGJaT-00054N-Or for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:51:50 -0800 Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so1022785gxk.6 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:51:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eYot3DtkY6zOOWvSI6VTdrRz8mfTXJKx/8FdR9UxpVw=; b=miqSuhKR68hDVw7bzp/ivdbhvs+PdcjJzHpznN/ZDGr0Etd1UlPjdDbaL3pudNUPZX AWReQ3QwHNHkLYWaouAVFPmqUdFMWriL7lktGnmP8yeuKLDzMSw1khFkWMX4w7MAXgqE uOnkSLJf4B3qpeymq8esTOEVK5Kg/w7pg8LvA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZGRQY+Q6nBcuEtUZTj7V0gtJvKIx9dHK6B1OMEIfzmITid6IlHAg9DbcuL2qtJXPo/ IZtldAOJEteLB145OM6awkfLa7V4rpF+Veck8R7yPQdumi9pgPc5aM16QJvkNgziydr4 eSbEZ/jz1QJTkrVz2NCiVehKrDQfMTKMZxGEw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.203.1 with SMTP id f1mr3338588agq.55.1259877099131; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:51:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <925d17560912031025v756adb41x909ab4dc11f28fe@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:51:39 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17560912031351u371119c8nce6329be6fd90728@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: what's a du'u? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 16561 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Brockman wrote: > 2009/12/3 Jorge Llambías : >> >> See also: >> http://www.wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9511/msg00557.html > > That is very interesting.  Do you support the bridi1 = su'u1 position? Yes. Either that, or accept that "bridi" has two meanings, the second one being the purely syntactical one "x1 (text) is a bridi consisting of a selbri x2 (text) inserted among sequence of sumti x3 (each of which is a text)". Something like this is what "bridi" is used for in English when discussing Lojban syntax. The mixed version, where x1 is a text but has arguments x3 that are not text doesn't really make a lot of sense. Many of the other Lojban grammar words have similar problems too. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.