From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Dec 03 17:17:41 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:17:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NGMnl-0005cZ-1E for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:17:41 -0800 Received: from mail-yx0-f202.google.com ([209.85.210.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NGMna-0005DL-55 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:17:32 -0800 Received: by yxe40 with SMTP id 40so1803461yxe.28 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:17:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4Btn5yf2kEj6+K64KEPAVFBkD/He9CTw32WoLnE7CGQ=; b=o3NFI/mydIWM+PkWDAxbXqVLmuy9O3qNddBvPpsZPNhdMtsepR4RIOMkIe1RK47eAh 83Kh/zEptLayDnYdnRnZosJOt7J7qpK0DBqRmyUCsG/kfKgrl1WiNtxngbgOvfhJiRdY Ztox6TLtPquGpgC7g6m3qQKFe1z1XkVSA+79k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QpSUiwmO7lzhUABob2A0xpu58kgnK810S2Aal5ieFdx3Ffwqu2pR3+eIKHZb8FvdSG KRjpBjG5jkHkYw9pH3PGvzpU8fgA0WVWbmH+4+cXAvKEhPrWkq5CxokVokTFLY6bJGrU 4zA43exvdR4cEvOldBA05Ljw9HUusJjPvP2m0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.127.20 with SMTP id z20mr3674329agc.118.1259889442970; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:17:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5715b9300912031705k6a6cd55cg7744ff3e77a094a7@mail.gmail.com> References: <925d17560912031025v756adb41x909ab4dc11f28fe@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560912031351u371119c8nce6329be6fd90728@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560912031513q7bbc1d1bu89ddeb8c21f48172@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9300912031540i41f36591mb91b3384f7ae11d7@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560912031606o84fd29cg3b882f9e620ef901@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9300912031705k6a6cd55cg7744ff3e77a094a7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:17:22 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17560912031717m680d2f6dlf15460ab4292655a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: what's a du'u? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 16575 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: > .ua > > so that's how a valid answer to {.i xu do klama} can be {go'i}.  I always > kind of wondered what happened to the {xu} when a person says {go'i}. "go'i" represents the selbri of the preceding bridi, in this case "klama". So responding "go'i" is like responding "klama". (The omitted sumti are normally assumed to be the same as those of the preceding bridi, but they need not be. > Although.... how is it that the {xu} doesn't get included when you have > A:  {do klama ti xu ta} > B:  {go'i} > ? Same thing, it's like responding "klama". mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.