From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Dec 03 17:34:10 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:34:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NGN3i-0006mc-Da for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:34:10 -0800 Received: from mail-yx0-f202.google.com ([209.85.210.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NGN3U-0006N1-UX for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:34:01 -0800 Received: by yxe40 with SMTP id 40so1814456yxe.28 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:33:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SbIxHBanbyHPxV3T0C8j8+h/LHJ9sBLywgDELdu9f2o=; b=AYNub6ZecpytEDOGKQS6SgTaKp4zP9d6JeZYHr9bos2n6gCCOhrLxwwYO2jnjKIk/t FKouFhVNkzIr4lus8abpA8eco9LNQn20fpICMLmOpUd+ok34zRR6tScVD6EIYOif4lzm g2A7nq0/x7ujzcqTWIxwZtycFyJyK6CGfT6xE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hbwkDeckDwiL1SWE/3lpFNVybaPoyF38asNhulquu+dclGGv9v+qpS7yufcMUGJlnv ULjbesKEqRwMyjdTCzu+TKX3EbLLSsRadoEridic1SU20sqEwe5dTNJYetCsQtKfnDpN 1XTyrysXDUA2KtHV0B0DP084CZtAd0L+PadlA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.45.18 with SMTP id s18mr4307292ybs.20.1259890430186; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:33:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <925d17560912031717m680d2f6dlf15460ab4292655a@mail.gmail.com> References: <925d17560912031025v756adb41x909ab4dc11f28fe@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560912031351u371119c8nce6329be6fd90728@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560912031513q7bbc1d1bu89ddeb8c21f48172@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9300912031540i41f36591mb91b3384f7ae11d7@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560912031606o84fd29cg3b882f9e620ef901@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9300912031705k6a6cd55cg7744ff3e77a094a7@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560912031717m680d2f6dlf15460ab4292655a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:33:50 -0500 Message-ID: <5715b9300912031733l1be9f2b2y4faa4f278bc32ab3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: what's a du'u? From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd330308c17100479dd19e3 X-archive-position: 16576 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --000e0cd330308c17100479dd19e3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable really? I thought {go'i} repeated the whole bridi. I remember at one poin= t this coming up on IRC and us coming to the conclusion that: A: do klama lo zarci B: go'i fa la djeims essentially becomes {do jo'u la djeims klama lo zarci} where we weren't really sure whether {jo'u} would be that or {joi}/{je}/what 2009/12/3 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Luke Bergen > wrote: > > .ua > > > > so that's how a valid answer to {.i xu do klama} can be {go'i}. I alwa= ys > > kind of wondered what happened to the {xu} when a person says {go'i}. > > "go'i" represents the selbri of the preceding bridi, in this case > "klama". So responding "go'i" is like responding "klama". (The omitted > sumti are normally assumed to be the same as those of the preceding > bridi, but they need not be. > > > Although.... how is it that the {xu} doesn't get included when you have > > A: {do klama ti xu ta} > > B: {go'i} > > ? > > Same thing, it's like responding "klama". > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.or= g > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > --000e0cd330308c17100479dd19e3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable really? =A0I thought {go'i} repeated the whole bridi. =A0I remember at = one point this coming up on IRC and us coming to the conclusion that:
A= : =A0 do klama lo zarci
B: =A0 go'i fa la djeims
es= sentially becomes {do jo'u la djeims klama lo zarci} where we weren'= ;t really sure whether {jo'u} would be that or {joi}/{je}/what

2009/12/3 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> .ua
>
> so that's how a valid answer to {.i xu do klama} can be {go'i}= .=A0 I always
> kind of wondered what happened to the {xu} when a person says {go'= i}.

"go'i" represents the selbri of the preceding bridi, in= this case
"klama". So responding "go'i" is like responding &q= uot;klama". (The omitted
sumti are normally assumed to be the same as those of the preceding
bridi, but they need not be.

> Although.... how is it that the {xu} doesn't get included when you= have
> A:=A0 {do klama ti xu ta}
> B:=A0 {go'i}
> ?

Same thing, it's like responding "klama".

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.


--000e0cd330308c17100479dd19e3-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.