From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 04 09:07:27 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NGbct-0005xk-3I for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:07:27 -0800 Received: from mail-yw0-f201.google.com ([209.85.211.201]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NGbc8-0005V7-SM for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:06:44 -0800 Received: by ywh39 with SMTP id 39so2420823ywh.25 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:06:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jQ4M6ff+9GNX3maYVZxXL6SeZYMf/Wk+tH0pPgy3wRk=; b=pQQ0BygbdpsTw9tdLrBeG/YFLzETHJmrlyEE2GPCWfXf560yTYBQKk7YCwgxPShTwv in2rHhe/PU+qPthbPBq1K4Sej/skGDk1+pVYtnWU8ANfZFUQ45SSQebVM4UPMj1wTpID XOI5UYKMJPEcQlRANGHj/mDLY4n9cR2Z8VdzA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=lsBi/lhqgNzUfOMToi6y+acw/Lqypp7ZEeI+rk2Q7Mg0yp6s+HwSULhQ6FMguHd4cx X5Q/ZHQFWs9uT+BMh7j4CjnCQJAguWIxg3ZI8zObrDJU0XWMLtINpkNsvP+8xezxQprP ISFzcSJCWeD6UjNfaQeZxdraLKhbu71ldZq7o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.150.17 with SMTP id x17mr5207617agd.57.1259946394259; Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:06:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <231765.58546.qm@web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <348584.67527.qm@web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <925d17560912021520q72a3b6c5mba2622589e233049@mail.gmail.com> <128928.6634.qm@web88006.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <925d17560912040709s28835ec9uf8817b491ce3b9c1@mail.gmail.com> <231765.58546.qm@web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 14:06:34 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17560912040906s37b8c173ya3cff4f851d2308a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: [jbovlaste] malranxi From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 16595 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: >> > >> > {c1 cusku c2 c3 c4 .ijebo lonu go'i cu ranxi lonu so'eda tersmu le go'e} >> > {c1 raxsku c2 c3 c4} >> >> What's "le go'e"? > > Well, both {go'i} and {go'e} were meant to refer to {c1 cusku c2 c3 c4 }. Then "le go'e" is c1, but that doesn't make sense. Even if you meant "le se go'e", I still don't think that works because the expectation is not really that most people have a meaning for c2, but rather that people normally say what they mean. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.