From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Dec 14 17:30:20 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:30:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NKMF0-0001QP-Cm for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:30:19 -0800 Received: from mail-yx0-f202.google.com ([209.85.210.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NKMEf-0000tB-8l for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:30:00 -0800 Received: by yxe40 with SMTP id 40so3483377yxe.28 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:29:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PSxM9MhsrQVemBC6UwomktHU4QS4y3kwpjT/ayrpDVU=; b=T/h1TLAGByIcni5MyBjsW/oeHCmuNlYSP/2eiRSQFBIgElN6Z6ghBujBXaiO34RkAe NaUdVvWci0rR3THhg8smxBhcukAKQYLicl8wYf3JGl74EV3q6wKiIYiOm/qKggSXEyCu 2umhQ4wq+2Li9pUiB/X45bfKlGmnnOwi21JFk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wcVkHjzGPXVGqz5H0QDqdOj6tyyjOf312TtPZFWJr6X78n3Q8ZSNcsJC4MD5tJ1M8P LEuEtYOBaFvym4vnFtZYFKAFYUteJHzKFcAemGyR1hu7g0BQ/i1aznN32D/17TKmo2XE oXsl7e3f8AIve48N0JZejZzyJmJXGLwwitAWQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.127.20 with SMTP id z20mr5572308agc.118.1260840591102; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:29:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <429fde40912141716h2ebb6d8cy928a4cc2eed97235@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:29:50 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0258fe73d834b0bf Message-ID: <429fde40912141729u1e932a19pd9e5e1384434af75@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Fwd: [lojban-beginners] xorlo, lo'e, and le'e From: Joshua Choi To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 16652 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: joshua@choi.name Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Ah, does it? I'm a beginner at Lojban, and I've been making xorlo part of my learning of the language, since it seems that it's basically standard now. Is this an unresolved or advanced question or something? On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 6:23 PM, james riley wrote: > I think this belongs on the main list, not the beginers list. > > cmacis > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Joshua Choi > Date: 2009/12/15 > Subject: [lojban-beginners] xorlo, lo'e, and le'e > To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org > > > I tried searching the mailing lists to see if it was answered, but > while I found the same question asked by Squark Rabinovich earlier > this year, I didn't find an answer for it: > > Under the xorlo reform, the articles in the LA and LE selma'o are > reformed. However, two articles in LE are not mentioned at all in > either the informal or formal proposals of xorlo: lo'e and le'e. What > is the status of these cmavo after xorlo? Are they deprecated? Or are > they included in xorlo? Or are they unchanged? > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.