From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Dec 17 07:42:03 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:42:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLIUI-0006kk-Ok for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:42:01 -0800 Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLIRo-0005QG-FE for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:39:29 -0800 Received: by pwi1 with SMTP id 1so1517681pwi.26 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:39:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=41p3RhJHbJUKFB+eEoxsK+hMUDE5CU8nTlDBr8nsnr0=; b=mYabDPOmt9BfHb0EeLeWj/CR1W4nnzr4I4CFHaemOS9j+zXagjJ8XTnmyg+CUzRYGC qda2rY6yZ2MWqZjbUlVAGgywSIphrkPonpTNwgWMwZkn+drMsdOChppy3jscHsy/22Tu gy3txTlawLGGKWE11CJgFD8LUJHkkTp4zx07w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=LP4X1ogN7q6gt3pdTTl5sf2jtSsTgU8flMoqGjqnRhh8nYUYikiNLLzp3/HCsjZ5Z8 IpUnmm6Ad6lGzf0LAWgMM4Vi/Mx2C69td4ZdGVWsXHM3kVOPXiouNTZDcgFvf6Jl1sSR YOA6JC2u0NmpHcfxwSAuCqUoyN/ND4axRya/Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.122.6 with SMTP id u6mr1780842wfc.95.1261064357412; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:39:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:39:17 -0500 Message-ID: <96f789a60912170739y7a799d02o2874d6063e8e63c4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] tagged termsets From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From the Esther wikiforum, btu received no response: X-archive-position: 16673 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Totus asked about the following at the end of [Esther] chapter 3 ciska tetai piro se mi'esku be la xaMAN. bei ge le turni pe le nolraitru ge'u .e le viptru vu'o poi turni ro selje'a ku'o gi le nobli be ro natmi be'o nu'i ge tecu'u ro selje'a sepi'o lo selyle'u pe ri gi tecu'u ro natmi bau lo bangu be ri "Shouldn't there be a {nu'u} in front of {gi}? (CLL Chapter 14, example 11..7)" I wasn't really sure. He may very well be right. Both parse, but I'm not sure exactly the difference is semantically (and jbofi'e doesn't handle tagged termsets), so I was wondering if some kind jbocre can help us out here? ---- So, anyone willing to answer? It came up again, --gejyspa To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.