From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Dec 17 08:11:50 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:11:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLIxA-0003BW-5Z for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:11:49 -0800 Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLIvO-0002S2-OX for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:10:04 -0800 Received: by pwi1 with SMTP id 1so1535153pwi.26 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:09:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BD0ZV2JBinOKz/sza/PM4q+B2tzCko3hqZd0//FNs6A=; b=sG/Ku1Z+a72N4Sxx74q/RcxyKtEiMna1fDS4n3bZKQwufMADYLU6AHKUoNHcJigol4 HvTnr9exd4nST4R6RAaXvtZtVA4ABVloJMNN7ZMepxLhbvc+m1VcHUirmG4KQnKWssjH ra3zdqcBYJPIDkcQ4OdHEoFUcDqDgtnEJ01io= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kGlSV6L0q4wi268PbCtjJQfcgsxQgYOrjQjMB1Pr9UBUP8qCrraDEeKIl7W+ihsxzK ISRyP5ilJOMqzs3p+sqN6JPQWTQERhUCMjwkkE73U9T5vtPJ6WSgsIgb4nLHA8dcneB1 l4AZEqEin4bFd8Vire7/mS8Wzb/kH2fsGjL0U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.60.3 with SMTP id i3mr1785032wfa.19.1261066191805; Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:09:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091217160325.GB12173@sdf.lonestar.org> References: <96f789a60912170739y7a799d02o2874d6063e8e63c4@mail.gmail.com> <20091217160325.GB12173@sdf.lonestar.org> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:09:51 -0500 Message-ID: <96f789a60912170809j231e72basc45f1a410792b5f1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: tagged termsets From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 16677 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Minimiscience wrote: > de'i li 17 pi'e 12 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Michael Turniansky .fy. cusku zoi > skamyxatra. >> Totus asked about the following at the end of [Esther] chapter 3 > ... >> So, anyone willing to answer?  It came up again > .skamyxatra > > This was already answered when you asked about this on the WikiDiscuss mailing > list two months ago.  Since I'm not sure how to link to that list's archives, > here are the responses that were given: > > Jorge: >> "Tagged termsets" or "tagged-term sets"? The former are not grammatical. >> >> Anyway, "nu'u" makes no difference, it's an elidable terminator, and >> there are two of them, one for each termset: >> >> nu'i ge tecu'u ro selje'a sepi'o lo selyle'u pe ri [nu'u] gi tecu'u >> ro natmi bau lo bangu be ri [nu'u] > > You replied: >> But why then does the CLL not mark the first nu'u as elidible in the >> example cited by Andrew?  I assumed that the scoping was somehow >> different between the two versions. > > Jorge replied: >> I assume it's just a typo. In fact the first "nu'u" is more elidable >> than the second, because "gi" itself always shows the end of the first >> termset. > > Do you still have any questions? > > mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun. > > -- > ko na xalni > Weird, I THOUGHT it had been answered, but I cou;dn't find the answer.. thanks -gy To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.