From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Jan 02 17:10:55 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:10:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NREzf-0004Wj-Ed for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:10:55 -0800 Received: from mail-ew0-f224.google.com ([209.85.219.224]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NREza-0004Um-Bj for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:10:55 -0800 Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so16819192ewy.26 for ; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:10:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qLhq4ESkjjVuSLmEE+Vi2uDRahyZzrf3dR+G8A2009o=; b=Ux34ACp8MW+EQtZOgdEPUH55O+iCltg/HRUqmrvQEfjiCPTMMIu3bw8w227k4CLudA Txec5KC+dfxsitRiu9OramCeRx5vmNyusrFkiMAy7CExE8oTVu5/SQqQVArSlLOnA2wC msiao18A8H9DUi9cCQWoKT+uiNHApg91qPyWE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=RhEma19K2Ec/Q7crp9c+qFVZX4HbAn+y3wohT8jW5a4vu4VNOKR5K6I7BG4olG5lOS 230hbnQjdO8MrKaKTAypK5QZ7yAVyFOT5GUN4cOpfRxpAtS2qBQ3pjb2sL1/aeCopWMQ ZWxWNYrFb9ZhbbTE6d3KAr8rQjQ8KLCb3jFDw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.23.203 with SMTP id s11mr4071566ebb.60.1262481043843; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 17:10:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <702226df1001021049q5a9c0c9jf839fef391384b83@mail.gmail.com> References: <702226df0912281343u74ba2a7dl73daef95d368cf0e@mail.gmail.com> <20091228232429.GA11894@sdf.lonestar.org> <96f789a61001010639s3bb87d33p4d8f559fe464bd60@mail.gmail.com> <12ee707c1001011625l5441c6cdv584735467cfe5d55@mail.gmail.com> <702226df1001021049q5a9c0c9jf839fef391384b83@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 12:10:43 +1100 Message-ID: <12ee707c1001021710s22660161h93c9a8c2edcd764d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: lo te cacra From: Geoff Hacker To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cdf7594276a38047c3846fb X-archive-position: 16757 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: geoff.hacker@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --000e0cdf7594276a38047c3846fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Wow, that's a great reform! Clearly a few things have changed since I was last a member of this list... in November 1997! Cheers, Geoff 2010/1/3 Jon "Top Hat" Jones > Right. xorlo makes lo the default gadri instead of le. It's never wrong to > use lo. > > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Daniel Brockman wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Geoff Hacker >> wrote: >> >>lo nu mi'o denpa fo le nu ve skina cu cacra li mu mi >> > >> > Can you explain to me why you used "lo" to describe "nu mi'o denpa"? >> >> Under xorlo, you don't need any particular reason to use {lo}, since >> it is completely generic. >> >> -- >> Daniel Brockman >> daniel@gointeractive.se >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to >> lojban-list-request@lojban.org >> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if >> you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. >> >> > > > -- > mu'o mi'e .aionys. > > .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu > > --000e0cdf7594276a38047c3846fb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Wow, that's a great reform! Clearly a few things have changed sinc= e I was last a member of this list... in November 1997!
=A0
Cheers,
=A0
Geoff

2010/1/3 Jon "Top Hat" Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com>=
Right. xorlo makes lo the defaul= t gadri instead of le. It's never wrong to use lo.=20


On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Daniel Brockman= <dbrockman@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Geoff Hacker <geoff.hacker@gmail.com> wrote= :
>>lo nu mi'o denpa fo le nu ve skina cu cacra li mu mi
&g= t;
> Can you explain to me why you used "lo" to describe "nu= mi'o denpa"?

Under xorlo, you don't need any par= ticular reason to use {lo}, since
it is completely generic.

--
Daniel Brockman
daniel@gointeractive.se


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojba= n.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.

=



--
mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe d= enpa bu


--000e0cdf7594276a38047c3846fb-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.