From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Jan 23 22:33:31 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:33:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NYw2M-000780-MU for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:33:31 -0800 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NYw2E-000707-T9 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:33:27 -0800 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=qvox_8X1a7kA:10 a=QAIeiNSIrF2djYgQp3kA:9 a=3mTvusYWnxmKI7yt3vm6xS1OmpYA:4 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 71.71.198.100 Received: from [71.71.198.100] ([71.71.198.100:37902] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id F2/8B-02041-CA9EB5B4; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 06:33:16 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91A8BB59 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:33:15 -0500 (EST) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: question about emphasis or something like it Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:33:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <5715b9301001211330y36354477q3ae3e3049512152a@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301001211425x545b84d3p82b1c3b40632358a@mail.gmail.com> <8905c87a1001231401ma53fa87i9b59e2a441064021@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8905c87a1001231401ma53fa87i9b59e2a441064021@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201001240133.13740.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-archive-position: 16859 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Saturday 23 January 2010 17:01:46 Judson Lester wrote: > Wouldn't that also be conveyed by place structure? > > In other words, I assume you'd use some more correct form of: > > lo te tavla spaji mi > > or > > lo nu do tavla spaji mi > > drani xu "cu" between "tavla" and "spaji", else the sentence is just two sumti, or "kei" in the second. Those mean "What (you) talked about surprised me" and "That you talked surprised me". "lo te tavla cu spaji mi" just says that what you talked about surprised me, irrespective of who talked about it. Pierre -- .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga .icu'u la ma'atman. To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.