From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Feb 23 06:50:35 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:50:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Njw5q-00049O-AB for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:50:34 -0800 Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Njw53-0003lg-MX for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:49:50 -0800 Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so2773260bwz.26 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:49:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bah7F0gIjhIk/U9KcniEGgssOnot2VQtmxDiWB/Y2bQ=; b=Z9k8gM89MTvwtGISdk4DAQVgId6E8Wbq6o6M3+YYLtP3HfLnnG9ZbKEtN51mO3Hzw8 Fi9suHU58Fa4n8zzQjE0e4ApuK2sTLDOdtuH3BYZ+uQ6NYll4MBAH7vOL31g305Q/ahn QR0relF3+Y3DhKuTbxT82XxhiQIYcl4LddD/c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=J2pY1MVk7jaYDCbzdxien6TlwxPFrt6UahTADpQZfNBe8IAjcBwHhPgt29hswJ1TAG z0hNRpObLXbKoCrzdM81MZ4xxG9ho8ercBQv+T+ne8ZgODESfwChIOfh8Ft+PJTxMdJS sx+rh/TUxi9XtdBpOF7VyFRTVHlXGv6FXYnDs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.144.86 with SMTP id y22mr3165530bku.43.1266936579115; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 06:49:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5715b9301002230616u73d81a02s2bfc0787482f9bc2@mail.gmail.com> References: <5715b9301002221045h726fbcaeu36140fc1b3f3b4e0@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a61002230435j250c43d2qd7c03a7bc9f8dd9e@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561002230446l244432adqba16088fc465232b@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301002230616u73d81a02s2bfc0787482f9bc2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:49:39 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17561002230649n47aaf614mfddb99ffdf14e1f4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: before or after From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 17011 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Luke Bergen wrote: > So from what I'm hearing here, it sounds like BAhE is pretty much the only > selma'o that modifies the following word, right?  (not counting SE, LE/LA, > etc...)  Or are there other cases as well? Well, if you don't count all the others, it is the only one. :) BAhE is like UI in that it can be attached to practically any word. There are other pre-modifiers (SE, NAhE, MOhI, FEhE, ...) but they can't be used with just any word. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.