From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 03 16:09:23 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:09:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Nmyd1-0008St-7w for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:09:23 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Nmyd0-0008SL-81 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:09:22 -0800 Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:09:22 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: More espeak words, please. Message-ID: <20100304000922.GF1159@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20100303220721.GX1159@digitalkingdom.org> <702226df1003031457i5f3bafe0w7df2dfa49ad6dc0b@mail.gmail.com> <20100303230307.GA1159@digitalkingdom.org> <702226df1003031510l1c53a9e1yc192b2ffdf99cbeb@mail.gmail.com> <20100303231339.GC1159@digitalkingdom.org> <702226df1003031536n376e5d09r1c817a5d0b67ceb2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <702226df1003031536n376e5d09r1c817a5d0b67ceb2@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-archive-position: 17066 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:36:01PM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Robin Lee Powell > <[1]rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 04:10:48PM -0700, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > � �The list of the items is finished, the definitions for Smart.fm are > not. > > � �In point of fact, there are exactly three areas that are not > finished- the > > � �audio for the entries, > > Yep. > > the simplified definitions for Smart.fm for about 70% of the > > items, > > Trivially producable from jbofihe data. �I still want someone to > explain to me why we're simplifying them in the first place? > > Oi, I've already said why. The gismu definitions need to be simplified > because, 1) The definitions from the gismu list are, more often than not, > too long for Smart.fm's cards, so they need to be shortened to fit, and 2) > They non-vocal punctuation needs to be edited out. > > For this reason the definition for bakfu, which in the gismu list is "x1 > is a bundle/package/cluster/clump/pack [shape/form] containing x2, held > together by x3", becomes "x1 is a bundle or pack containing x2 held > together by x3" Again: that can be done well enough for the vast majority of words by a simple script, and then fix the mistakes by hand. I just hate to see people spending human time when machine time would do the job. Tell me what format you want it in, and I'll write something to do what you just did to all the gismu. -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" See http://shrunklink.com/cdiz http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.