From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Mar 04 14:15:01 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:15:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NnJJs-0005gX-NC for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:15:01 -0800 Received: from mail-fx0-f222.google.com ([209.85.220.222]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NnJJn-0005fF-3t for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:15:00 -0800 Received: by fxm22 with SMTP id 22so3454245fxm.26 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:14:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CIpqzsVhZ3D57F9gHCbJrunoy2Nq5ik1Vpqoeb7D6ak=; b=suKyIJDe6XvtQWjKk4ahfDFiAp5TH9HEsWXNOqoZkE2q01HgNw/31Iq9K5RkB/GKgZ kefg4pYmEHWpiwWuIDGn1lb2WqdngsyDK5ebkqo9z8+GAN5LIarHoaIgDUQWfaTWTPib 7FqPfb3FarqjO7sdJmI0Bcrjb9O8aJsPE5VsQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HLznVxUyy9x3L2+F9bkj8LLYPj7WeYjJUzjNwEQW2zOoytROIMEwAIF7eiOK1gBFUg giWuNHbiP43YDijuJo3fISJwFPcdykHVqIB7wDgAghjobhEOD//xfb7FJBz68O8IEOO5 ll525a3XrIDazq86lbK5Tucq2Q+JuZ96a2T+Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.3.137 with SMTP id 9mr28881fan.49.1267740888549; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:14:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5715b9301003041359u2e158b13gac898593a8311c1d@mail.gmail.com> References: <395141.17119.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <96f789a61003040653h3cbf33fbn82c24ece8e63ec22@mail.gmail.com> <925d17561003040928r5d2d85efma8db985509ffbadf@mail.gmail.com> <369994.71546.qm@web50404.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <925d17561003041351u11a65d8fpadc799cd405f8291@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301003041359u2e158b13gac898593a8311c1d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:14:48 -0300 Message-ID: <925d17561003041414w6122f0c4y757f43f70a9bbcd5@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Fw: bridi tail negation From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 17081 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list 2010/3/4 Luke Bergen : > But what if he wanted to emphasize the x2 place? Like {lo zarci se klama > mi} instead of {mi klama lo zarci}? (You do need "cu" in front of "se klama".) I'm not sure I understand your question, mu'o mi'e xorxes > 2010/3/4 Jorge Llamb¨Şas >> >> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Lindar Greenwood >> wrote: >> >> >>  {.i na'e se zanfri fa lonu zutse ne'i le ricyzda gi'e na tavla}? >> > >> > I have nothing helpful to contribute other than pointing out that you >> > didn't need to explicitly mark {fa} if you used {se}. >> > It isn't wrong, it's just redundant. >> >> Actually, he wouldn't need "fa" if he hadn't used "se". With "se", he >> does need "fa" because he sent the place he wants to fill, originally >> x2, to x1. >> >> mu'o mi'e xorxes >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org >> with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if >> you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. >> > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.