From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Mar 09 11:52:05 2010 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:52:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Np5TJ-0007BS-Fb for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:52:05 -0800 Received: from ol.freeshell.org ([192.94.73.20] helo=sdf.lonestar.org) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Np5TE-00078j-95 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:52:04 -0800 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:jwodder@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o29Jpo3L023474 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:51:50 GMT Received: (from jwodder@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.3/8.12.8/Submit) id o29Jpnba013145 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:51:49 GMT Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 19:51:49 +0000 From: Minimiscience To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: stage-4 fu'ivla construction exception? Message-ID: <20100309195148.GA28243@sdf.lonestar.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <96f789a61003090826i27a6531eob88df0e3bfce7e14@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <96f789a61003090826i27a6531eob88df0e3bfce7e14@mail.gmail.com> Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-archive-position: 17149 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: minimiscience@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 09 Mar 2010, 11:26:12 -0500, Michael Turniansky wrote: > I can't use "n", because it creates the impermissible triple "ndj". Section 4.7 of the CLL, after the description of {fu'ivla} morphology, states: > Note that consonant triples or larger clusters that are not at the beginning > of a fu'ivla can be quite flexible, as long as all consonant **pairs** are > permissible. (Emphasis added.) There is a similar statement for {cmevla}, and so the CLL can be interpreted as prohibiting "ndj" et alii only from use in {lujvo}. The last time I asked about this, I was told that the BPFK has yet to decide whether this restriction actually applies to {fu'ivla} or not. mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun. -- mi citka loi cidjrspageti fi'o sanmi lo cersai To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.