Article: 4102 of sci.lang: Path: marob!phri!sci.ccny.cuny.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!hp4nl!ruuinf!praxis!jagversm From: phri!sci.ccny.cuny.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!hp4nl!ruuinf!praxis!jagversm >From: jagversm@praxis.cs.ruu.nl (Koen Versmissen) Newsgroups: sci.lang Subject: possible readings of "John seeks a bike or a fish" Keywords: natural language, quantification, intensionality Message-ID: <3320@ruuinf.cs.ruu.nl> Date: 22 May 90 12:29:36 GMT Sender: news@ruuinf.cs.ruu.nl Lines: 40 Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Thu May 24 11:29:38 EDT 1990 X-From-Space-Address: phri!sci.ccny.cuny.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!hp4nl!ruuinf!praxis!jagversm What are the possible readings of the sentence >John seeks a bike or a fish< in natural language? Technically there are, I think, eight readings: "to seek" being an intensional verb, both "bike" and "fish" can be either intensional or extensional. Furthermore, the disjunction can apply to either the speaker or John. Let me paraphrase: 1. There are a bike and a fish, and John is trying to find one of these (he doesn't care which one). 2. There are a bike and a fish, and John is trying to find one of these (but I don't know which of the two he's actually looking for). 3. There is a bike, and John is trying to find either this bike or a (possibly non-existent) fish (he doesn't care...) 4. There is a bike, and John is trying to find either this bike or some fish (but I don't know...). 5. & 6. Similar to 3. & 4., but with the roles of "bike" and "fish" interchanged. 7. John is looking for a (possibly non-existent) bike or a (possibly non-existent) fish, and will be satisfied when he has found either one. 8. John is looking for a bike or a fish, both possibly non- existent, but I don't know which one he's looking for. I hope this is clear. This came up during a talk on quantification in natural language. A theory thereof should account exactly for those readings acceptable in natural language. But which ones are in fact acceptable? Koen.