Received: by magpie.MASA.COM (smail2.5) id AA20102; 11 Dec 90 03:29:36 EST (Tue) Received: by marob.uucp (/\=-/\ Smail3.1.18.1 #18.1) id ; Tue, 11 Dec 90 03:09 EST Received: by hombre.MASA.COM (smail2.5) id AA10961; 11 Dec 90 03:52:35 EST (Tue) Received: from cbmvax.UUCP by uunet.UU.NET (5.61/1.14) with UUCP id AA20189; Fri, 7 Dec 90 06:11:58 -0500 Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore Jan 13 1990) id AA07767; Fri, 7 Dec 90 06:11:11 EST Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\=-/\ Smail3.1.18.1 #18.14) id ; Fri, 7 Dec 90 03:12 EST Message-Id: Date: Fri, 7 Dec 90 03:12 EST From: marob!uunet!cbmvax!snark.thyrsus.com!lojbab (Bob LeChevalier) To: cowan@marob.masa.com Subject: zwicky response, also sent to eric's machine address for you Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Tue Dec 11 03:29:37 1990 X-From-Space-Address: marob!hombre!uunet!cbmvax!snark!lojbab Zwicky finally replied, and he is clearly not an 'enemy' of the project like JCB thought him to be. I suspect that indeed he is quite well-disposed towards us, based on what he wrote, and what he obviously thinks was a long careful study-and-review that led to the published critique. More ancient history that needs to be re-written, and more historical evidence showing what might have happened if JCB had not been so damned paranoid. At any rate, please bear this in mind when ever you get to writing your response, and of course, we should send him the draft copy before we consider publishing it ourselves or submitting it to Language. Date: Mon, 3 Dec 90 15:35:17 PST From: cbmvax!uunet!csli.Stanford.EDU!zwicky (Arnold Zwicky) To: lojbab@snark.thyrsus.com Subject: reply bob - you must have thought i was never going to answer your message of (ouch) 25 october. it fell to the bottom of a pile of non-crisis things to do and might well just have perished there. some good can come from cleaning up desks and files. incredibly enough, there are two zwickys who sometimes post to sci.lang. the other - zwicky@erg.sri.com and also zwicky@cis.ohio-state.edu - is my daughter, however, so that anyone who takes the last name to be a unique pointer is not far off. i much enjoyed doing the loglan piece in 1968. the task served some important selfish purposes, mostly getting myself to think in a systematic way about linguistic universals and the differences between logical systems and natural languages. along the way, i got to say some (i think) usefully critical things about loglan. but i wasn't interested in loglan for its own sake, and the review took an extraordinary amount of time for me to do - worth it then. now i think i have to use my time for other things. i'm sure you anticipated some such response. i have occasionally come across loglan/lojbab enthusiasts in linguistics, but i think they've all been undergraduates or beginning grad students. (not entirely an accident, i'd guess; the project appeals naturally to very bright and idealistic young people.) have you tried posting a request for reviewers on sci.lang? (you might well have; i've been obliged to `k' and `c' through a lot of stuff since the summer, so that i could easily have missed it.) best wishes. - arnold To: cbmvax!uunet!csli.Stanford.EDU!zwicky Subject: Re: reply Actually, I identified you as much through what you wrote, as well as the name Zwicky, though I had thought that your daughter was you, anyway. We have been talking up Lojban on sci.lang, but not seeking any sort of definitive review, simply because we don't have a final documentation of the sort of Jim Brown's book. When we do, that will be the time for it. I was more interested in seeing whether we had specifically addressed your criticisms, which were the most detailed I've ever seen in print, never answered by Jim Brown, and widely referenced by other critics of Loglan. Some of these critics were involved in reviewing Brown's NSF proposals in the 70's (but of course are unknown to us since they are anonymous reviews). We will be again seeking finding, possibly from NSF, and any preparation we can do to prevent people's misunderstandings of Loglan/Lojban, especially in academia, would be helpful. If we ever write our response to your review up as such, I'll send you an advance info copy,so you can at your disgression correct any misunderstandings we had of what you said. Otherwise, feel free to pass my name and address (net or postal) to anyone who mentions Loglan or Lojban to you. Thanks much for responding. .ioco'omi'e bab lecevalier. (Respect/Partings/Self-Identification) -- lojbab = Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 lojbab@snark.thyrsus.com