Return-Path: Message-Id: <9106252033.AA24251@relay1.UU.NET> Date: Tue Jun 25 22:30:35 1991 To: lojban-list@snark.thyrsus.com Sender: "ACAD3A::FTSLR" From: "STEVE L RICE" Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Tue Jun 25 22:30:35 1991 X-From-Space-Address: cbmvax!uunet!ALASKA.BITNET!FTSLR I find that I've been "unambiguously hostile." Hostile to LLG, yes; I utterly oppose its methods. Hostile to Lojban as such, no. I thought that I responded to rudeness and arrogance, but of course that doesn't justify answering in kind (or "unkind"). Anyway, posting about LLG evidently just leads to grouching matches, so I won't do so any more. All I ask is that you not go commenting on Loglan without checking with someone who knows the language first. (And I won't go interpreting Lojban to the logli masses without checking with you.) I should also point out that had the merger lojbab refers to been accepted, it would have been accepted by the Board of Trustees (which I'm not connected with). I would have been involved in the linguistic end of the merger, not in the politics. I'm a linguist, not a politico. My reference to "gossip" was unfortunate; it stemmed from personal correspondence which shouldn't have been mentioned here. If anyone wishes to discuss Loglan, please feel free to contact me. Steve Rice