Return-Path: <cbmvax!uunet!cs.washington.edu!pardo>
From: cbmvax!uunet!cs.washington.edu!pardo
Return-Path: <pardo@cs.washington.edu>
Message-Id: <9106202340.AA01944@gar.cs.washington.edu>
To: jimc@math.ucla.edu
Cc: lojban-list@snark.thyrsus.com, pardo@gar.cs.washington.edu
Subject: Re: categorization and generalization... 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 19 Jun 91 17:21:33 -0800."
             <9106200021.AA20907@luna.math.ucla.edu> 
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 91 16:40:22 -0700
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Jun 20 20:10:31 1991
X-From-Space-Address: cbmvax!uunet!cs.washington.edu!pardo

> Since explicit mass reference is not familiar to English speakers,
> they tend to get confused by it.

What about the much/many distinction?

		  How much bread is on the table?
		* How many bread is on the table?

	;-D on  ( Referential transparancy or massless? )  Pardo