Return-Path: From: cbmvax!uunet!ee.mu.OZ.AU!nsn Message-Id: <9108020300.AA28671@munagin.ee.mu.OZ.AU> To: lojban-list@snark.thyrsus.com Cc: nsn@ee.mu.OZ.AU Subject: Satire? Who said satire? Organisation: Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Melbourne Smiley-Convention: %^) Date: Fri, 02 Aug 91 13:00:57 +1000 Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Fri Aug 2 04:27:22 1991 X-From-Space-Address: cbmvax!uunet!ee.mu.OZ.AU!nsn Another repost from the conlang list. Well *I* found it funny: Message-Id: <9107251617.AA26990@BU.EDU> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 91 12:14 EDT From: Ronald Hale-Evans Subject: SUPERL To: conlang@buphy.bu.edu X-Vms-To: CONLANG [The following "Non-Fact Article" appears in the science fiction anthology *Universe 10*, edited by Terry Carr, published in hardcover by Doubleday & Co. and in paperback by Zebra Books. It is copyright (c) 1980 by Terry Carr, and appears here without the permission of the publishers.] SUPERL Charles E. Elliott Your request for information [writes Lt. Comdr. Boethius C. Heminstitch, the Public Relations Officer of the division of Unusual Languages of the U.S. Coast Guard] about SUPERL has been forwarded to me. I hope that you will not take offense because I have not used SUPERL in this letter; it has been a long-standing policy of this office to answer all requests in the language of the request. As you probably already know, SUPERL is a language devised to replace all of the so-called natural languages. It is streamlined and rationally designed and has every advantage over the "natural" languages. SUPERL was developed by a team of U.S. Coast Guard linguists on an abandoned oil rig off Santa Barbara. The Coast Guard sponsored this research and development project for obvious reasons having to do with interservice funding. The project stretched over a period of six months and resulted in Coast Guard handbooks in SUPERL Grammar, SUPERL Phonology, and SUPERL Readers I and II. At present an exhaustive SUPERL Dictionary is under preparation. Over five hundred centers for teaching SUPERL have been established, and it is already the official language of several government departments. The advantages of SUPERL are many. Using it, speakers may talk directly in mathematics, physics, chemistry, spherical trigonometry, and anthropology, without the necessity of an intervening language. It of course makes direct conversion of the foot-pound-Fahrenheit system to the metric-Celsius system, thus relieving users of laborious and time-consuming computations. In its binary mode, SUPERL may be used directly with computers, bypassing any computer languages. With SUPERL a thesaurus is unnecessary: an alphabetical listing *is* a thesaurus. The real relationships of concepts are phonologically represented, and the unwholesome arbitrariness of phonetic symbolization is done away with. The articulation of SUPERL involves many facial muscles, so that it is impossible to say something illogical in SUPERL without at least a weak smile. Blatant absurdities result in broad grins and repeated winks. However, while these are major advantages, they might be built into "natural" languages. SUPERL has, in addition, two characteristics that no "natural" language has: truth and compactness. Grammatical utterances in SUPERL are always *true*. Thus, new truths about the universe can be discovered by babbling. This has obvious advantages. Speakers of SUPERL have at their tongue tip (so to speak) the combined knowledge of mankind, and, what is more, all the facts about the universe they will ever need. The Coast Guard is presently exploiting this characteristic in a unique project. Thirty garrulous people have been gathered in our laboratory in Peoria and instructed to talk about whatever interests them. What they say is recorded and will be compiled into the SUPERL Encyclopedia. We modestly hope that ultimately this will be the Ultimate Compendium of All Knowledge. If it is ever declassified it may prove of interest to scholars and teachers. The grammar of SUPERL is equipped for many uses. For example, history can be recounted using the past perfect. Count nouns are used for the nobility, and there are mass nouns for the people. And not only does it have a passive voice for the cautious, it even has a future tense for the anxious. SUPERL is, in addition, amazingly compact. What may be a lengthy exegesis in a "natural" language is often a simple sentence in SUPERL. A classic example of this is B.A. Booper's refutation of stratificational analysis. It was a single word! Whole novels have been written on the back of Howard Johnson menus. SUPERL lends itself quite naturally to poetry. For example: Gnuj Wroj --which shows a height of lyricism not often attained in awkward "natural" languages. The approximate English translation is "As the moon casts silvery fingers (*or* greasy forks) over the spider's (*or* lampshade's *or* fodder's) back, does he (*or* the moon) care, really care? I will return (*or* become nauseous) to my beloved (*or* the general public). Is there any other way? (*or* Do you have any oranges?)" The entire works of Shakespeare are being translated into SUPERL; the result is expected to be a single trilogy of plays. There may be some difficulties with actual production, for, as one writer observed, "The cast is large, but the soliloquies are short." In spite of the many advantages of SUPERL, large numbers of people still sullenly refuse to say anything in it. We guess that this may be the result of half-baked rumors and spurious opinions about SUPERL. It would be well to straighten out a few expressions of anti-SUPERL sentiment. Some object because speakers seem to be unable to make jokes in SUPERL. This seems to be a rather pointless objection. Jokes have their place, but there are all sorts of practical jokes that don't require any use of language at all. Let those who cite this as an objection stitch a friend's trouser legs together, or pour olive oil into their wives' cocktail glasses. In any case, to satisfy these spoilsports, we may point out that already a team of United States Coast Guard Transmogrificational Grammarians is at work devising a set of standard jokes that may be recited in SUPERL. That chimpanzees seem to be able to learn SUPERL faster and better than human beings is not really an objection to the language, either. There is simply a difference between the brains of chimps and the brains of human beings. *Vive la diffe'rence!* The rumor that a certain anthropological finding, an artifact, had no name in SUPERL, and that proponents of SUPERL subsequently smashed and disposed of the artifact, has no truth in it. Speakers of SUPERL have tested this rumor by trying to repeat it in SUPERL. They were able to repeat this rumor, but only with broad grins and guffaws. Thus, even if true, the rumor had to be most illogical. The most vicious rumor is that it is possible to say "The world is coming to an end soon" in SUPERL without even the hint of a smile. This we must simply discount. If the present trend of diversity in "natural" languages continues to pollute our linguistic atmosphere, we really *are* in for trouble. Let the anti-SUPERLites consider that, instead of carping at a minor inconsistency in SUPERL. I hope I have given you the information you require. You may be amused to know that there *are* dirty words in SUPERL. In the interests of National Security, however, these words have been classified and may be used only by the highest echelons of the government and the military. Please write me directly if you are in need of further information about SUPERL. I would also be grateful if you would forward to me the names of any you hear being critical of SUPERL. Please indicate in your report if they are supported by any government moneys. *********************************************************************** Isn't this classic? Who is Charles E. Elliott? Has he published any other work? I will do an electronic library search after I send this off and let y'all know. In any case, I don't think *Universe 10* is in print, and I have seen "SUPERL" nowhere else, so I don't think anyone is losing revenue here. I sent a xerox of this piece to Bob LeChevalier (lojbab@snark.thyrsus.com), prime mover behind Lojban, but he didn't think it was very funny. I wonder why? Besides being a brilliant satire of the planned language movement (and I think we can see a little bit of Esperanto, Loglan/Lojban, BABM, the "a priori" languages of Descartes and friends, Solresol, maybe even Lincos, in here), this piece raises some interesting philosophical questions. *Why* can't we create a language where grammatical correctness implies factual correctness? (Douglas Hofstadter is great for this stuff; see *Goedel, Escher, Bach*.) Here's another question: Why can't we create such a compact language? Again, Hofstadter has an interesting comment on this in *Metamagical Themas*; he devises the word "cohatalat", which is an acronym for "come over here and take a look at this", a phrase most of us use often enough. Why hasn't a word like "cohatalat" evolved to fill this niche? Actually, I tend to think we *can* create more compact language in just this way. I don't think I would have any problem using "cohatalat" in everyday speech if anyone actually knew what it meant. The compactness aspect of SUPERL reminds me also of R.C.W. Ettinger's book *Man into Superman*, where he speculates on the possibility of making future language more compact and expressive by using all phonemes that can be generated by (super-)human vocal organs, and using more of the possible short words. (For example, "at" and "it" exist in English, but why aren't "et", "ot", and "ut" words?) Further comments, anyone? Your pal, Ron Hale-Evans P.S. Check the Esperanto lists for an upcoming posting of Wm. Auld's translation of John Lennon's "Imagine" ("Imagu").