From cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!LOJBAN Tue Dec 17 17:30:17 1991 Return-Path: Date: Tue Dec 17 17:30:17 1991 Message-Id: <9112172120.AA10980@relay1.UU.NET> Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!otago.ac.nz!pucc.PRINCETON.EDU!chandley Sender: Lojban list From: Chris Handley Subject: Re: the art of running uphill X-To: LOJBAN%CUVMA.BITNET@pucc.princeton.edu To: John Cowan , Eric Raymond , Eric Tiedemann Status: RO Nick writes (among many other pertinent points) > >>A second standardizing force will be the dictionary writers. > >I personally think that the dictionary will be a flop, and that >Lojban is a language antithetic to dictionary dependence, the >language being used so word-creatively. Look to the Full Analytical >Dictonary of Esp as an example to avoid: Larousse superposed on >Esp, or Oxford on Lojban, will not work. > I guess what we really need (more than Larousse, Oxford or Roget) is either or both of Fowler and Strunk. Any volunteers? Chris Handley chandley@otago.ac.nz Dept of Computer Science Ph (+64) 3-479-8499 University of Otago Fax (+64) 3-479-8577 Dunedin, NZ