Return-Path: <cbmvax!uunet!bradford.ac.uk!C.J.Fine>
From: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!bradford.ac.uk!C.J.Fine>
Message-Id: <19792.9201101243@mail.bradford.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: logical connection
To: cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 92 12:43:13 GMT
Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban list)
Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!bradford.ac.uk!C.J.Fine
In-Reply-To: <no.id>; from "John Cowan" at Jan 9, 92 11:55 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL0]
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Sat Jan 11 00:39:37 1992
X-From-Space-Address: cbmvax!uunet!bradford.ac.uk!C.J.Fine

la djan. kau,n sei ri selsmadi befi le lervelsku befe le cmene se'u
danfu fimi fe di'e
tu'eli'o

>  
> I think this example shows clearly why not.  "klama" actually has five places,
> so
>  
>         mi klama la lidz. .e la bradfrd.
>  
> means
>  
>         mi klama la lidz. e. la bradfrd. zo'e zo'e zo'e
>  
> If this is construed as
>  
>         mi klama la lidz. da de di .ije mi klama la bradfrd. da de di
>  
> in order to be sure that the origin (da) is the same in both bridi,
> then we are put in the silly position of insisting that the route (de) must
> also be the same for both destinations!  Thanks for providing this example.
tu'u

.i di'u melbi ke ciksi se jarco ci'e

.i co'omi'e kolin fain

[Intended glosses:
John Cowan (this is a guess how he spells his name) answers me thus.

This is a beautiful demonstration, thank you.