From cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!LOJBAN Mon Feb 10 16:25:41 1992 Return-Path: Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19) id ; Mon, 10 Feb 92 16:25 EST Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA08995; Mon, 10 Feb 92 14:45:59 EST Received: from cunixf.cc.columbia.edu by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA22239; Mon, 10 Feb 92 14:17:40 -0500 Received: from cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu by cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (5.59/FCB) id AA11821; Mon, 10 Feb 92 14:17:38 EST Message-Id: <9202101917.AA11821@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.1) with BSMTP id 0011; Mon, 10 Feb 92 14:16:17 EST Received: by CUVMB (Mailer R2.07) id 7578; Mon, 10 Feb 92 14:15:41 EST Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1992 17:12:58 GMT Reply-To: CJ FINE Sender: Lojban list From: CJ FINE Subject: Re: easy text X-To: fschulz@PYRPS5.ENG.PYRAMID.com X-Cc: Lojban list To: John Cowan , Eric Raymond , Eric Tiedemann In-Reply-To: ; from "F. Schulz" at Feb 8, 92 1:55 pm Status: RO Frank's easy text: > .i li so e li no cfipu mi le ka na dikni > '9' and '0' confuse me in-property not regular. The meaning of ".e" is such that this logically implies (nibli) li so cfipu mi li'o .ije li no cfipu mi li'o I suspect that this is not what you meant! kolin c.j.fine@bradford.ac.uk