Return-Path: Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19) id ; Tue, 11 Feb 92 22:36 EST Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA13627; Tue, 11 Feb 92 16:26:54 EST Received: from cunixf.cc.columbia.edu by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA16925; Tue, 11 Feb 92 15:34:16 -0500 Received: from cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu by cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (5.59/FCB) id AA15637; Tue, 11 Feb 92 15:34:18 EST Message-Id: <9202112034.AA15637@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.1) with BSMTP id 2726; Tue, 11 Feb 92 15:31:42 EST Received: by CUVMB (Mailer R2.07) id 7381; Tue, 11 Feb 92 15:31:15 EST Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1992 08:29:52 GMT+1200 Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!otago.ac.nz!cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu!chandley Sender: Lojban list From: Chris Handley Subject: Re: Billions X-To: LOJBAN%CUVMA.bitnet@cunyvm.cuny.edu To: John Cowan , Eric Raymond , Eric Tiedemann Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Tue Feb 11 22:36:33 1992 X-From-Space-Address: cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!LOJBAN Colin writes: >We make more use of the metric system here than in the US, I think, >so insofar as anybody uses Giga- and Mega-, they are familiar here. >(I happen to think that anything outside Mego- to micro- is a >worthless accretion to the metric system, but that is another >matter). The only (possible) problem is in the translation - if you >gloss "gigdo" as "billion" rather than "Giga-": but actually, >thanks to American cultural imperialism ;-) and the fact that >billion = 1E9 is more useful in the modern world, that ambiguity >now exists in everyday British life, with most people (including >the influential newspapers) following what was formerly American >usage, and those who cannot bring themselves to use the term in >that way avoiding it altogether. > >[On the subject, I have only ever come across phrases like >"quintillion" in American popular science books - I believe they >are vacuous, as the only thing directly conveyed to me by the >choice between "quintillion" and "quadrillion", say, is that the >one is bigger than the other - since both are in the realm that I >cannot comfortably hold in my mind, the distinction is nugatory. >End of rant] > The only people who really use very large and very small numbers are scientists (and the bean counters who try to figure out the US national debt). However even they rarely use more than 6 or 8 digits, the rest is in exponential notation - Avogadro's number is about 10^24, some of the isotopes of Helium have a half life of 10^-23 seconds. However, Colin's claim that prefexes outside the Mega- to micro- range are worthess, is a little specious - capacitors are routinely measured in picofarads, wavelengths of light in nanometers, wavelengths of radio waves in GigaHertz and so on, although I grant that the more extreme prefixes are rarely used outside the realm of particle physics. However, seeing Lojban has got the prefixes for these, it would be useful if psuedo-number words could be made from them, even if only to help future Lojbani physicists - it would be much easier to say 3 Attons than 3 times ten to the fifteen. Chris Handley chandley@otago.ac.nz Dept of Computer Science Ph (+64) 3-479-8499 University of Otago Fax (+64) 3-479-8577 Dunedin, NZ