Return-Path: Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19) id ; Tue, 11 Feb 92 22:37 EST Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA00178; Tue, 11 Feb 92 20:37:00 EST Received: from rutgers.edu by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA21794; Tue, 11 Feb 92 20:22:15 -0500 Received: from cbmvax.UUCP by rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.4/3.08) with UUCP id AA05436; Tue, 11 Feb 92 18:06:52 EST Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA20113; Tue, 11 Feb 92 18:05:07 EST Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU (via uunet.UU.NET) by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA07192; Tue, 11 Feb 92 15:38:28 -0500 Message-Id: <9202112038.AA07192@relay2.UU.NET> Received: from CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU by CUVMB.COLUMBIA.EDU (IBM VM SMTP R1.2.1) with BSMTP id 2769; Tue, 11 Feb 92 15:36:54 EST Received: by CUVMB (Mailer R2.07) id 7496; Tue, 11 Feb 92 15:35:36 EST Date: Tue, 11 Feb 1992 14:35:13 CST Reply-To: "Dean C. Gahlon" Sender: Lojban list From: "Dean C. Gahlon" Subject: Unofficial alphabet lists for Lojban/Latin/English, Greek, and Russian X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan In-Reply-To: John Cowan's message of Tue, 11 Feb 1992 14:08:13 EST <9202111957.AA21045@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Tue Feb 11 22:37:37 1992 X-From-Space-Address: cbmvax!uunet!cuvma.bitnet!LOJBAN John Cowan writes: (WRT letterals) "and it would be most useful to have Devanagari and Japanese kana as well." I don't know about Devanagari, but as for Japanese kana, given that (with the exception of ) they already represent syllables, would it not make sense for the letteral for each one to be the pronunciation of that particular symbol, possibly with some additional syllable added for those whose values are simple vowels? (I'd produce a sample set of letterals under this scheme, but don't have a list of kana here) Dean Gahlon dean@ns.network.com