From cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!LOJBAN Thu Mar 26 15:10:40 1992
Return-Path: <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!LOJBAN>
Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19)
	id <m0lU0mP-0001JcC@snark.thyrsus.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 92 15:10 EST
Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91)
	id AA14145; Thu, 26 Mar 92 15:08:18 EST
Received: from pucc.Princeton.EDU by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA24675; Thu, 26 Mar 92 13:22:29 -0500
Message-Id: <9203261822.AA24675@relay2.UU.NET>
Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.Princeton.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 6893; Thu, 26 Mar 92 13:15:53 EST
Received: by PUCC (Mailer R2.08 ptf015) id 0810; Thu, 26 Mar 92 13:15:27 EST
Date:         Thu, 26 Mar 1992 10:56:36 GMT
Reply-To: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!C.J.Fine>
Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!pucc.Princeton.EDU!LOJBAN>
From: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!C.J.Fine>
Subject:      RE: A fairy tale
X-To:         chandley@otago.ac.nz
X-Cc:         Lojban list <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,
        Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,
        Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <no.id>; from "Chris Handley" at Mar 26, 92 9:58 am
Status: RO

Chris writes:
>
> Colin writes:
>
> >I agree retrospectively - anaphora is wonderful,
>
> Tsk, tsk. "anaphora" is a plural word, hence "anaphora _are_ ...".
>
Thank you pedant. I don't often get these wrong - and in fact I wrote
under the impression that "anaphora" was also the term for the process
of using anaphors.  If it isn't, what is the term, somebody?

                        kolin