From cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!LOJBAN Fri Mar 13 15:29:35 1992 Return-Path: Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19) id ; Fri, 13 Mar 92 15:29 EST Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA08158; Fri, 13 Mar 92 13:13:27 EST Received: from pucc.Princeton.EDU by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA17094; Fri, 13 Mar 92 12:22:09 -0500 Message-Id: <9203131722.AA17094@relay1.UU.NET> Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.Princeton.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 2842; Fri, 13 Mar 92 12:06:00 EST Received: by PUCC (Mailer R2.08 PTF011) id 0143; Fri, 13 Mar 92 12:05:45 EST Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1992 10:39:10 EST Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Re: Lojban Names. X-To: Lojban List To: John Cowan , Eric Raymond , Eric Tiedemann In-Reply-To: <9203130239.AA04376@relay1.UU.NET>; from "Mark E. Shoulson" at Mar 12, 92 9:36 pm Status: RO > Um, no, I *don't* think doing latitude and longitude is a good plan in > general, though it might be a useful auxiliary in cases where we can't > assume the hearer has ever heard of New York... Those who have not heard of New York, have probably not heard of longitude and latitude either. -- cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban