Return-Path: <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!LOJBAN>
Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19)
	id <m0lRl6G-0000maC@snark.thyrsus.com>; Fri, 20 Mar 92 10:01 EST
Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91)
	id AA07078; Fri, 20 Mar 92 04:58:00 EST
Received: from pucc.Princeton.EDU by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA00327; Fri, 20 Mar 92 00:51:04 -0500
Message-Id: <9203200551.AA00327@relay1.UU.NET>
Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.Princeton.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with BSMTP id 2420; Fri, 20 Mar 92 00:50:38 EST
Received: by PUCC (Mailer R2.08 ptf012) id 1218; Fri, 20 Mar 92 00:50:21 EST
Date:         Wed, 18 Mar 1992 19:31:55 GMT
Reply-To: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!C.J.Fine>
Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!pucc.Princeton.EDU!LOJBAN>
From: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!C.J.Fine>
Subject:      Re: tense-aspect --> ZAhO?
X-To:         iad@cogsci.edinburgh.ac.uk
X-Cc:         Lojban list <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,
        Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,
        Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
In-Reply-To:  <no.id>; from "Ivan A Derzhanski" at Mar 7, 92 2:55 pm
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Fri Mar 20 10:01:50 1992
X-From-Space-Address: cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!LOJBAN

Ivan asks:
>
>
> Re things like {le mo'u zdani}...
>
>
> It doesn't say that ZAhO can be used independently as a tag without
> being preceded (and eventually followed) by an <interval-property>.
> What is going on?  Is the BNF grammar just incomplete in this regard,
> or has this usage become legal after 24.2.1991?
>

My copy of the grammar (BNF.28) has the <interval-property> optional.

                        Kolin