From cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!LOJBAN Wed Apr  1 14:32:34 1992
Return-Path: <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!LOJBAN>
Date: Wed Apr 1 14:32:34 1992
Message-Id: <9204011449.AA26509@relay1.UU.NET>
Reply-To: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!C.J.Fine>
Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!CUVMA.BITNET!pucc.Princeton.EDU!LOJBAN>
From: CJ FINE <cbmvax!uunet!BRADFORD.AC.UK!C.J.Fine>
Subject:      Re: Quine text (retraction)
X-To:         Nick Nicholas <nsn@MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.au>
X-Cc:         Lojban list <lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu>
To: John Cowan <cowan@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,
        Eric Raymond <eric@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>,
        Eric Tiedemann <est@SNARK.THYRSUS.COM>
Status: RO

I answered you thus:
> >
> > {lo remna cu morsi} doesn't make me think of "Man is mortal". Go for {loi
> > remna}, or {ro remna zo'u ri ba morsi}.
>
> Point taken, but "loi remna" is just plain wrong. Perhaps "ro remna cu
> (paroi?) morsi".
>
In the light of John Cowan's explanation, I retract this remark. I
didn't understand "lVi" either.

                        kolin