From cbmvax!uunet!CUVMB.BITNET!LOJBAN Thu Jul 9 12:01:44 1992 Return-Path: Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19) id ; Thu, 9 Jul 92 12:01 EDT Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA00577; Thu, 9 Jul 92 11:41:05 EDT Received: from pucc.Princeton.EDU by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA24331; Thu, 9 Jul 92 10:55:23 -0400 Message-Id: <9207091455.AA24331@relay1.UU.NET> Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.Princeton.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4282; Thu, 09 Jul 92 10:46:16 EDT Received: by PUCC (Mailer R2.08 ptf034) id 0030; Thu, 09 Jul 92 10:45:33 EDT Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1992 09:52:18 EDT Reply-To: John Cowan Sender: Lojban list From: John Cowan Subject: Addendum to lojbab on 'pei' X-To: Lojban List To: John Cowan , Eric Raymond , Eric Tiedemann Status: RO Lojbab's comment that UI+pei asks for the intensity to which the UI applies to the listener needs to be supplemented by an explanation of pei+UI. This construct asks whether or not the UI applies at all. For example: oipei How much pain are you in? pei.oi Are you in pain at all? -- cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban