From cbmvax!uunet!CUVMB.BITNET!LOJBAN Fri Jul 10 07:37:57 1992 Return-Path: Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19) id ; Fri, 10 Jul 92 07:37 EDT Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA23675; Fri, 10 Jul 92 07:36:43 EDT Received: from pucc.Princeton.EDU by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA02853; Fri, 10 Jul 92 06:51:20 -0400 Message-Id: <9207101051.AA02853@relay1.UU.NET> Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.Princeton.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 9400; Fri, 10 Jul 92 04:43:30 EDT Received: by PUCC (Mailer R2.08 ptf034) id 9224; Fri, 10 Jul 92 04:43:20 EDT Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1992 18:19:11 +1000 Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU!nsn Sender: Lojban list From: cbmvax!uunet!MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU!nsn Subject: Colin's relatives proposal X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu X-Cc: nsn@ee.mu.oz.au To: John Cowan , Eric Raymond , Eric Tiedemann Status: RO Though time for such changes is running out EXTREMELY fast, I offer cautious support to Colin's c-th proposal on incidental/restrictive relatives. I think it is worth Bob, John and pc taking time out on it; I also fear that, with Mark, Colin and Ivan out of town, this might have to wait a bit (and we can't delay too long)> But I do agree that something with the relatives *is* broken. --- 'Dera me xhama t"e larm"e, T Nick Nicholas, EE & CS, Melbourne Uni Dera mbas blerimit | nsn@munagin.ee.mu.oz.au (IRC: Nicxjo) Me xhama t"e larm"e! | Milaw ki ellhnika/Esperanto parolata/ Lumtunia nuk ka ngjyra tjera.' | mi ka'e tavla bau la lojban. je'uru'e - Martin Camaj, _Nj"e Shp'i e Vetme_ | *d'oh!*