From cbmvax!uunet!cuvmb.bitnet!LOJBAN Fri Jul 10 23:59:23 1992 Return-Path: Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19) id ; Fri, 10 Jul 92 23:59 EDT Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA25261; Fri, 10 Jul 92 22:43:50 EDT Received: from rutgers.edu by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA29699; Fri, 10 Jul 92 22:11:07 -0400 Received: from cbmvax.UUCP by rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.4/3.08) with UUCP id AA14801; Fri, 10 Jul 92 21:30:59 EDT Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA18075; Fri, 10 Jul 92 21:05:51 EDT Received: from pucc.Princeton.EDU by relay2.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA24628; Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:18:36 -0400 Message-Id: <9207102318.AA24628@relay2.UU.NET> Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.Princeton.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4237; Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:07:41 EDT Received: by PUCC (Mailer R2.08 ptf034) id 4329; Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:06:57 EDT Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1992 17:50:52 EDT Reply-To: cbmvax!snark!cowan Sender: Lojban list Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was cbmvax!cowan@UUNET.UU.NET From: cbmvax!snark!cowan Subject: Re: Colin's relatives proposal X-To: uunet!CTR.COLUMBIA.EDU!shoulson@uunet.UU.NET To: John Cowan In-Reply-To: <9207101401.AA21066@relay1.UU.NET>; from "Mark E. Shoulson" at Jul 10, 92 9:47 am Status: RO la mark. clsn. cusku di'e > I the relatives definitiely need to be looked at, but at the risk of > throwing a spanner into the works, where does the new cmavo {voi} fit in? > Is it restrictive or incidental? It is restrictive, and is to "poi" as "le" is to "lo". -- cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan e'osai ko sarji la lojban