From cbmvax!uunet!cuvmb.bitnet!LOJBAN Mon Jul 27 17:01:16 1992 Return-Path: Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19) id ; Mon, 27 Jul 92 17:01 EDT Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA12706; Mon, 27 Jul 92 16:10:20 EDT Received: from rutgers.edu by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA19698; Mon, 27 Jul 92 15:59:45 -0400 Received: from cbmvax.UUCP by rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.4/3.08) with UUCP id AA12251; Mon, 27 Jul 92 15:30:03 EDT Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA07801; Mon, 27 Jul 92 15:07:13 EDT Received: from pucc.Princeton.EDU by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA24070; Mon, 27 Jul 92 14:47:48 -0400 Message-Id: <9207271847.AA24070@relay1.UU.NET> Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.Princeton.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 4359; Mon, 27 Jul 92 14:47:08 EDT Received: by PUCC (Mailer R2.08 ptf034) id 6764; Mon, 27 Jul 92 14:45:55 EDT Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1992 13:35:26 BST Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122 Sender: Lojban list From: cbmvax!uunet!oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122 Subject: NU variations X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: RO Is there any real _semantic_ difference between lenu broda le jai fau broda le jai fi'o fasnu fe'u broda I haven't checked them all, but the rest of the NU appear to have similar counterparts. (Obviously there's a _syntactic_ difference when supplying sumti for the broda, or for the NU (or the tag).)