Return-Path: Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19) id ; Fri, 10 Jul 92 14:44 EDT Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA10597; Fri, 10 Jul 92 11:09:56 EDT Received: from pucc.Princeton.EDU by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA21066; Fri, 10 Jul 92 10:01:27 -0400 Message-Id: <9207101401.AA21066@relay1.UU.NET> Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.Princeton.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1100; Fri, 10 Jul 92 09:51:01 EDT Received: by PUCC (Mailer R2.08 ptf034) id 7991; Fri, 10 Jul 92 09:49:58 EDT Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1992 09:47:39 -0400 Reply-To: "Mark E. Shoulson" Sender: Lojban list From: "Mark E. Shoulson" Subject: Colin's relatives proposal X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan , Eric Raymond , Eric Tiedemann In-Reply-To: nsn%MULLIAN.EE.MU.OZ.AU@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU's message of Fri, 10 Jul 1992 18:19:11 +1000 Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Fri Jul 10 14:44:29 1992 X-From-Space-Address: cbmvax!uunet!CUVMB.BITNET!LOJBAN I the relatives definitiely need to be looked at, but at the risk of throwing a spanner into the works, where does the new cmavo {voi} fit in? Is it restrictive or incidental? Anyway, I'm off for two weeks or so. Later. ~mark