Return-Path: Received: by snark.thyrsus.com (/\==/\ Smail3.1.21.1 #21.19) id ; Wed, 8 Jul 92 01:57 EDT Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA04716; Tue, 7 Jul 92 20:00:49 EDT Received: from rutgers.edu by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA17710; Tue, 7 Jul 92 19:24:11 -0400 Received: from cbmvax.UUCP by rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.4/3.08) with UUCP id AA13041; Tue, 7 Jul 92 18:23:29 EDT Received: by cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com (5.57/UUCP-Project/Commodore 2/8/91) id AA29063; Tue, 7 Jul 92 17:31:55 EDT Received: from pucc.Princeton.EDU by relay1.UU.NET with SMTP (5.61/UUNET-internet-primary) id AA21817; Tue, 7 Jul 92 15:31:50 -0400 Message-Id: <9207071931.AA21817@relay1.UU.NET> Received: from PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU by pucc.Princeton.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3440; Tue, 07 Jul 92 15:30:46 EDT Received: by PUCC (Mailer R2.08 ptf033) id 7953; Tue, 07 Jul 92 15:30:14 EDT Date: Tue, 7 Jul 1992 13:10:20 BST Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122 Sender: Lojban list From: cbmvax!uunet!oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122 Subject: Re: Wallops #8 X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan Status: RO X-From-Space-Date: Wed Jul 8 01:57:31 1992 X-From-Space-Address: cbmvax!uunet!cuvmb.bitnet!LOJBAN zoi by. Pray tell by. mintu le xomoi be lu pe'ipei li'u .ce'oku'i lu pe'upei li'u Am I missing out on some sort of rule for combination of UI? Up till now I've had the impression that UI are essentially independent, apart from a few which are specifically intended as modifiers. "pe'ipei" seems to mean "This is what I think - what about you?".