From cbmvax!uunet!cuvmb.bitnet!LOJBAN Tue Aug 25 13:58:03 1992
Return-Path: <cbmvax!uunet!cuvmb.bitnet!LOJBAN>
Date: Tue Aug 25 13:58:03 1992
Message-Id: <9208251323.AA25656@relay1.UU.NET>
Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122
Sender: Lojban list <cbmvax!uunet!pucc.princeton.edu!LOJBAN>
From: cbmvax!uunet!oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122
Subject:      RE: le le la jbotur. ckafyzda ku jbofitpla
X-To:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: John Cowan <cowan@snark.thyrsus.com>
Status: RO

> Oh, now I see.  Hmmmm.  Maybe some UIs could do the trick.  Maybe
> {fidakaunaizo'o no'uzo'onai}?  Not that much better, and I'm misusing
> {kau}.  Wasn't it originally proposed as a cmavo for "known!"?  What should
> be used for that meaning now?
>
> ~mark

I can't quite make up my mind whether the new {bi'u} ("new",
"not-yet-mentioned") and {bi'unai} ("old", "previously-mentioned")
can serve for "unknown" and "known".

Iain.