From cbmvax!uunet!cuvmb.bitnet!LOJBAN Mon Aug 31 00:41:11 1992 Return-Path: Date: Mon Aug 31 00:41:11 1992 Message-Id: <9208310230.AA18893@relay1.UU.NET> Reply-To: cbmvax!uunet!mullian.ee.mu.oz.au!nsn Sender: Lojban list From: cbmvax!uunet!mullian.ee.mu.oz.au!nsn Subject: Re: More Text From Dave Young X-To: I.Alexander.bra0122@oasis.icl.co.uk, lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: John Cowan In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Aug 92 17:25:19 BST." Status: RO >.iki'ubo smuni falenu basti zo xo lu xo prenu li'u ^^^^^ >because the intention is to replace {xo} in {xo prenu}, ^^^^^^^^^ No; {smuni} is "mean" as in "meaning" as in semantics; not "mean" as in intention. I don't know what gismu will do for intention; and until someone comes up with a good expression, I'd stick with {djica}. Re my post on The Cafe Newsletter: where *are* my manners! *Of course* Veijo should be editor in chief of the journal, and coordinator of the project. Nick.