From cowan  Sat Mar  6 22:51:10 2010
Subject: RE: proposals regarding abstractors
To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List)
From: cowan
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 92 10:44:15 EDT
In-Reply-To: <9208171140.AA05981@getafix.oasis.icl.co.uk>; from "oasis.icl.co.uk!I.Alexander.bra0122" at Aug 17, 92 12:40 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Tue Aug 18 10:44:15 1992
X-From-Space-Address: cowan
Message-ID: <3zZ6DWmOPZB.A.2sH.ez0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la .i,n cusku di'e

> BUT
> 
> The latest gismu list says that the x2 of {cusku} is
> "du'u/text/lu'e concept", i.e. {le du'u broda} is a text.
> All the other words with a {du'u} place don't have such
> alternatives, but appear to make more sense with a "concept"
> rather than a "text".

Delete "du'u" from the x2 of "cusku"; it was obviously inserted in error.
When it was written, the uses of "sedu'u" were not understood.
Otherwise, I believe everything you say is correct.

-- 
John Cowan	cowan@snark.thyrsus.com		...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan
			e'osai ko sarji la lojban.