From cowan  Sat Mar  6 22:51:12 2010
Subject: stress on -MOI words
To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu (Lojban List)
From: cowan
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 11:20:08 EDT
In-Reply-To: <9208280109.AA20128@relay1.UU.NET>; from "CJ FINE" at Aug 27, 92 11:17 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Status: RO
X-From-Space-Date: Mon Aug 31 11:20:08 1992
X-From-Space-Address: cowan
Message-ID: <3aFRY-VdalJ.A.NtH.gz0kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

> Incidentally, it seems to me that there is no necessity for number
> brivla (-MOI) to have da'amoi terbasna, since phonologically they are
> so'ocma - their syntactic status as brivla seems irrelevant to this
> question. pinka xu

Correct.  This is one of JCB's errors that we have fixed by the introduction
of "boi" to separate consecutive numbers (the old "five 55-gallon drums"
example).  Numeric selbri are no longer thought of as brivla, although they
are still grammatically equivalent to them.

-- 
John Cowan	cowan@snark.thyrsus.com		...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan
			e'osai ko sarji la lojban.