From LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu  Sat Mar  6 22:55:51 2010
Received: from uga.cc.uga.edu by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Tue, 6 Oct 1992 13:25:41 -0400
Received: from UGA.CC.UGA.EDU by uga.cc.uga.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 8026; Tue, 06 Oct 92 13:24:13 EDT
Received: by UGA (Mailer R2.08 PTF008) id 4682; Tue, 06 Oct 92 13:24:12 EDT
Date:         Tue, 6 Oct 1992 18:24:42 BST
Reply-To: C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.BITNET@uga.cc.uga.edu>
From: C.J.Fine@BRADFORD.AC.UK
Subject:      RE: CAFE.INT.REV zoi pu. le kafybarja po'u la jbolaz. pu
To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-From-Space-Date: Tue Oct  6 13:25:41 1992
X-From-Space-Address: @uga.cc.uga.edu:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET
Message-ID: <1hAUnDNSonF.A.WLB.330kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

Iain replies to me on Iain:
>
> > > no'i lo be'ipre cu klama co veigau lemi selcpe po'u
> > > le barda tsali bo ckafi gi'ebabo
> > tsali ki'a? .i le ki'a
> > > nalsirkla mo'ize'oku na'e mo'ifa'a le jupku'a
>
> I wasn't sure what to use for "strong coffee".  I considered {carmi},
> which may be the correct answer.  But I wasn't sure what {tsali} was for.
> I notice your (and Andrew's) "le nu bandu" piece uses it where I
> would have used {vlipa} (more on this piece to follow).


I'm not sure, either. "tsali" is about a property and a standard, while
"vlipa" is about an action, so you may be right on both counts. I still
don't like "tasli ckafi" though.
>
> Are you complaining about the {le} in {le barda tsali bo ckafi}?

go'i
> I'm not sure why I used {le}, but on the other hand, I'm not sure
> what's wrong with it.
>
	kolin