From @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Thu Jan 28 18:01:21 1993 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 1993 07:34:08 -0500 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3799; Fri, 29 Jan 93 07:32:45 EST Received: from CUVMB.BITNET by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 8217; Fri, 29 Jan 93 07:32:54 EST Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 18:01:21 GMT Reply-To: I.Alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk Sender: Lojban list From: I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK Subject: RE: GENERAL: rafsi changes are not yet in place X-To: lojbab@grebyn.com X-Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Erik Rauch Status: RO X-Status: Message-ID: <-2x0SNUrTzH.A.HOC.g70kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org> la lojbab. cusku di'e > John Cowan just posted to the extent that "sle" was the rafsi for selci and > not selfu. This is incorrect, since the rafsi changes are not in place and > published. Hmmm. That's the rafsi given in the LogFlash gismu list dated 07/06/92, which I got from the PLS. It's sometimes difficult to keep track of what's official and what's not.