From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU Sat Mar 6 22:59:45 2010 Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 1993 12:21:40 -0500 Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 5470; Fri, 29 Jan 93 12:20:15 EST Received: from CUVMB.BITNET by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP id 9945; Fri, 29 Jan 93 12:19:31 EST Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1993 12:17:00 -0500 Reply-To: Logical Language Group Sender: Lojban list From: Logical Language Group Subject: RE: GENERAL: rafsi changes are not yet in place X-To: I.Alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk X-Cc: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu To: Erik Rauch Status: RO X-Status: X-From-Space-Date: Fri Jan 29 07:17:00 1993 X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET Message-ID: Things should be settling down fairly soon, since we'll go to the new rafsi list when it is published with JL18 in April, and hopefully will go out on thee list and PLS at the same time. Also by then, we may have set a publication date for the first book, the protodictionary, which will certainly become the new standard when it is published. The problems of officialness are compounded for people on the List since you usually hear of changes when they are still at the proposal stage, and we have to slow down adoption of changes to allow for the people who don;t get email, as well as to allow our baselining controls to work. lojbab