From LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU  Sat Mar  6 22:59:44 2010
Received: from YALEVM.YCC.YALE.EDU by MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU via SMTP; Fri, 29 Jan 1993 07:34:08 -0500
Received: from CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU by YaleVM.YCC.Yale.Edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)    with BSMTP id 3799; Fri, 29 Jan 93 07:32:45 EST
Received: from CUVMB.BITNET by CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (Mailer R2.07) with BSMTP  id 8217; Fri, 29 Jan 93 07:32:54 EST
Date:         Thu, 28 Jan 1993 18:01:21 GMT
Reply-To: I.Alexander.bra0125@oasis.icl.co.uk
Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN%CUVMB.bitnet@YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU>
From: I.Alexander.bra0125@OASIS.ICL.CO.UK
Subject:      RE: GENERAL: rafsi changes are not yet in place
X-To:         lojbab@grebyn.com
X-Cc:         lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
To: Erik Rauch <erikr@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-From-Space-Date: Thu Jan 28 18:01:21 1993
X-From-Space-Address: @YaleVM.YCC.YALE.EDU:LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET
Message-ID: <M-mZbYIZJjP.A.QOC.g70kLB@chain.digitalkingdom.org>

la lojbab. cusku di'e

> John Cowan just posted to the extent that "sle" was the rafsi for selci and
> not selfu.  This is incorrect, since the rafsi changes are not in place and
> published.

Hmmm.  That's the rafsi given in the LogFlash gismu list dated
07/06/92, which I got from the PLS.
It's sometimes difficult to keep track of what's official and
what's not.